Maiden of Golgenna - Latest Comments on Post frequency/patterns http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 kuhnrat in response to: Post frequency/patterns Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:19:31 +0000 c2635@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ (As mentioned above at not opposing the will and mind of ordos still holds.) I've recently indulged in the splendour of editing my own post and have found it most... (well, most something, adjective descriptions fails my mind at the moment, at this time of hour, etc. etc. Not the point anyway.) So it came to a epiphany to me that if I could edit my posts, then others could also edit them. Which opens the means for you our (all powerful) (insert other blatantly praising here...) youish... (whatever) to edit our intent and paste it to shape the story more fitfully. For instant, my latest story post takes lots of certainty and liberties. Which could cause difficulties for you to weave the storytelling. So my point is, for me (this postings), if you like. I wouldn't hold it against you, (then again a grudge is a grudge that shouldn't be left lightly) if you cut and pasted the intended writings to fit the narrative as long as the initial text is kept at the same said narrative at the written intent shaped into your (our) narrative. So indulge yourself in our (my) feedbacks and shape (smooth) your storyline. Well knowingly that the initial posts are received at our e-mails and could (you bet) be used against you at a later time. (In the fullness of time, at the appropriate junction.) (I don't think I could have written this more clearly. I tried. But I hold you at the highest regard, but alas, my words just fails me.) http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2635 agent jebediah in response to: Post frequency/patterns Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:44:45 +0000 c2602@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ What they said... http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2602 kuhnrat in response to: Post frequency/patterns Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:51:58 +0000 c2601@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ I do not oppose the will of the holy ordos. http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2601 delvy in response to: Post frequency/patterns Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:31 +0000 c2599@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ I concur Sir. Most heartily. http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2599 tancred in response to: Post frequency/patterns Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:18:39 +0000 c2596@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ Not agreeing is - of course - heresy and warrants a visit from the appropriate Ordo. http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2596 agenthaxtes in response to: Post frequency/patterns Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:17:17 +0000 c2595@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/ most reasonable http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/2DH/2011/03/21/post-frequency-patterns#c2595