<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/7.2.5-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Reavers of Abaddon - Latest Comments on SD Verbum Finalis (Final Word)</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/3BC/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/3BC/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=574" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=7.2.5-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>tancred in response to: SD Verbum Finalis (Final Word)</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_1"><span class="identity_link_username">tancred</span></span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c4190@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/</guid>
			<description>Systems: Average, Skill: Average, Loyalty: Good. Given the immense size and venerable age of the ship it is unlikely that its Systems can be improved. A Good crew IS possible, but most likely not worthy it, as it would strip half the fleet of experienced officers and ratings. Loyalty is hard to improve further because of this ship&#039;s size and role (but given its garrison of Astartes and more it will never defect or suffer a mutiny!).</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Systems: Average, Skill: Average, Loyalty: Good. Given the immense size and venerable age of the ship it is unlikely that its Systems can be improved. A Good crew IS possible, but most likely not worthy it, as it would strip half the fleet of experienced officers and ratings. Loyalty is hard to improve further because of this ship's size and role (but given its garrison of Astartes and more it will never defect or suffer a mutiny!).]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/3BC/dn-final-word#c4190</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tancred in response to: SD Verbum Finalis (Final Word)</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_1"><span class="identity_link_username">tancred</span></span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c4158@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/</guid>
			<description>Improved version. Replaces dorsal lances with bombardment cannon; shorter range, but more portent. Better fit for a battle barge. Added Thunderhaws in separate bays. Has 2x teleportarium.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Improved version. Replaces dorsal lances with bombardment cannon; shorter range, but more portent. Better fit for a battle barge. Added Thunderhaws in separate bays. Has 2x teleportarium.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/3BC/dn-final-word#c4158</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tancred in response to: SD Verbum Finalis (Final Word)</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_1"><span class="identity_link_username">tancred</span></span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c4157@http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/</guid>
			<description>Draft of the Verbum Finalis, using default BFG rules.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Draft of the Verbum Finalis, using default BFG rules.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.twilightpeaks.net/blogs/index.php/3BC/dn-final-word#c4157</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
